Official PyTorch Implementation of HELP: Hardware-adaptive Efficient Latency Prediction for NAS via Meta-Learning (NeurIPS 2021 Spotlight)

Overview

[NeurIPS 2021 Spotlight] HELP: Hardware-adaptive Efficient Latency Prediction for NAS via Meta-Learning [Paper]

This is Official PyTorch implementation for HELP: Hardware-adaptive Efficient Latency Prediction for NAS via Meta-Learning.

@inproceedings{lee2021help,
    title     = {HELP: Hardware-Adaptive Efficient Latency Prediction for NAS via Meta-Learning},
    author    = {Lee, Hayeon and Lee, Sewoong and Chong, Song and Hwang, Sung Ju},
    booktitle = {Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)},
    year      = {2021}
} 

Overview

For deployment, neural architecture search should be hardware-aware, in order to satisfy the device-specific constraints (e.g., memory usage, latency and energy consumption) and enhance the model efficiency. Existing methods on hardware-aware NAS collect a large number of samples (e.g., accuracy and latency) from a target device, either builds a lookup table or a latency estimator. However, such approach is impractical in real-world scenarios as there exist numerous devices with different hardware specifications, and collecting samples from such a large number of devices will require prohibitive computational and monetary cost. To overcome such limitations, we propose Hardware-adaptive Efficient Latency Predictor (HELP), which formulates the device-specific latency estimation problem as a meta-learning problem, such that we can estimate the latency of a model's performance for a given task on an unseen device with a few samples. To this end, we introduce novel hardware embeddings to embed any devices considering them as black-box functions that output latencies, and meta-learn the hardware-adaptive latency predictor in a device-dependent manner, using the hardware embeddings. We validate the proposed HELP for its latency estimation performance on unseen platforms, on which it achieves high estimation performance with as few as 10 measurement samples, outperforming all relevant baselines. We also validate end-to-end NAS frameworks using HELP against ones without it, and show that it largely reduces the total time cost of the base NAS method, in latency-constrained settings.

Prerequisites

  • Python 3.8 (Anaconda)
  • PyTorch 1.8.1
  • CUDA 10.2

Hardware spec used for meta-training the proposed HELP model

  • GPU: A single Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080Ti
  • CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Silver 4114 CPU @ 2.20GHz

Installation

$ conda create --name help python=3.8
$ conda activate help
$ conda install pytorch==1.8.1 torchvision cudatoolkit=10.2 -c pytorch
$ pip install nas-bench-201
$ pip install tqdm
$ conda install scipy
$ conda install pyyaml
$ conda install tensorboard

Contents

1. Experiments on NAS-Bench-201 Search Space

2. Experiments on FBNet Search Space

3. Experiments on OFA Search Space

4. Experiments on HAT Search Space

1. Reproduce Main Results on NAS-Bench-201 Search Space

We provide the code to reproduce the main results on NAS-Bench-201 search space as follows:

  • Computing architecture ranking correlation between latencies estimated by HELP and true measured latencies on unseen devices (Table 3).
  • Latency-constrained NAS Results with MetaD2A + HELP on unseen devices (Table 4).
  • Meta-Training HELP model.

1.1. Data Preparation and Model Checkpoint

We include all required datasets and checkpoints in this github repository.

1.2. [Meta-Test] Architecture ranking correlation

You can compute architecture ranking correlation between latencies estimated by HELP and true measured latencies on unseen devices on NAS-Bench-201 search space (Table 3):

$ python main.py --search_space nasbench201 \
		 --mode 'meta-test' \
		 --num_samples 10 \
		 --num_meta_train_sample 900 \
                 --load_path [Path of Checkpoint File] \
		 --meta_train_devices '1080ti_1,1080ti_32,1080ti_256,silver_4114,silver_4210r,samsung_a50,pixel3,essential_ph_1,samsung_s7' \
		 --meta_valid_devices 'titanx_1,titanx_32,titanx_256,gold_6240' \                 
                 --meta_test_devices 'titan_rtx_256,gold_6226,fpga,pixel2,raspi4,eyeriss' 

You can use checkpoint file provided by this git repository ./data/nasbench201/checkpoint/help_max_corr.pt as follows:

$ python main.py --search_space nasbench201 \
		 --mode 'meta-test' \
		 --num_samples 10 \
		 --num_meta_train_sample 900 \
                 --load_path './data/nasbench201/checkpoint/help_max_corr.pt' \
		 --meta_train_devices '1080ti_1,1080ti_32,1080ti_256,silver_4114,silver_4210r,samsung_a50,pixel3,essential_ph_1,samsung_s7' \
		 --meta_valid_devices 'titanx_1,titanx_32,titanx_256,gold_6240' \                 
                 --meta_test_devices 'titan_rtx_256,gold_6226,fpga,pixel2,raspi4,eyeriss' 

or you can use provided script:

$ bash script/run_meta_test_nasbench201.sh [GPU_NUM]

Architecture Ranking Correlation Results (Table 3)

Method # of Training Samples
From Target Device
Desktop GPU
(Titan RTX Batch 256)
Desktop CPU
(Intel Gold 6226)
Mobile
Pixel2
Raspi4 ASIC FPGA Mean
FLOPS - 0.950 0.826 0.765 0.846 0.437 0.900 0.787
Layer-wise Predictor - 0.667 0.866 - - - - 0.767
BRP-NAS 900 0.814 0.796 0.666 0.847 0.811 0.801 0.789
BRP-NAS
(+extra samples)
3200 0.822 0.805 0.693 0.853 0.830 0.828 0.805
HELP (Ours) 10 0.987 0.989 0.802 0.890 0.940 0.985 0.932

1.3. [Meta-Test] Efficient Latency-constrained NAS combined with MetaD2A

You can reproduce latency-constrained NAS results with MetaD2A + HELP on unseen devices on NAS-Bench-201 search space (Table 4):

$ python main.py --search_space nasbench201 --mode 'nas' \
                 --load_path [Path of Checkpoint File] \
                 --sampled_arch_path 'data/nasbench201/arch_generated_by_metad2a.txt' \
                 --nas_target_device [Device] \ 
                 --latency_constraint [Latency Constraint] 

For example, if you use checkpoint file provided by this git repository, then path of checkpoint file is ./data/nasbench201/checkpoint/help_max_corr.pt, if you set target device as CPU Intel Gold 6226 (gold_6226) with batch size 256 and target latency constraint as 11.0 (ms), command is as follows:

$ python main.py --search_space nasbench201 --mode 'nas' \
                 --load_path './data/nasbench201/checkpoint/help_max_corr.pt' \
                 --sampled_arch_path 'data/nasbench201/arch_generated_by_metad2a.txt' \
                 --nas_target_device gold_6226 \ 
                 --latency_constraint 11.0 

or you can use provided script:

$ bash script/run_nas_metad2a.sh [GPU_NUM]

Efficient Latency-constrained NAS Results (Table 4)

Device # of Training Samples
from Target Device
Latency
Constraint (ms)
Latency
(ms)
Accuracy
(%)
Neural Architecture
Config
GPU Titan RTX
(Batch 256)
titan_rtx_256
10 18.0
21.0
25.0
17.8
18.9
24.2
69.7
71.5
71.8
link
link
link
CPU Intel Gold 6226
gold_6226
10 8.0
11.0
14.0
8.0
10.7
14.3
67.3
70.2
72.1
link
link
link
Mobile Pixel2
pixel2
10 14.0
18.0
22.0
13.0
19.0
25.0
69.7
71.8
73.2
link
link
link
ASIC-Eyeriss
eyeriss
10 5.0
7.0
9.0
3.9
5.1
9.1
71.5
71.8
73.5
link
link
link
FPGA
fpga
10 4.0
5.0
6.0
3.8
4.7
7.4
70.2
71.8
73.5
link
link
link

1.4. Meta-Training HELP model

Note that this process is performed only once for all NAS results.

$ python main.py --search_space nasbench201 \
                 --mode 'meta-train' \
                 --num_samples 10 \
                 --num_meta_train_sample 900 \
                 --meta_train_devices '1080ti_1,1080ti_32,1080ti_256,silver_4114,silver_4210r,samsung_a50,pixel3,essential_ph_1,samsung_s7' \
                 --meta_valid_devices 'titanx_1,titanx_32,titanx_256,gold_6240' \           
                 --meta_test_devices 'titan_rtx_256,gold_6226,fpga,pixel2,raspi4,eyeriss' \
                 --exp_name [EXP_NAME] \
                 --seed 3 # e.g.) 1, 2, 3

or you can use provided script:

$ bash script/run_meta_training_nasbench201.sh [GPU_NUM]

The results (checkpoint file, log file etc) are saved in

./results/nasbench201/[EXP_NAME]

2. Reproduce Main Results on FBNet Search Space

We provide the code to reproduce the main results on FBNet search space as follows:

  • Computing architecture ranking correlation between latencies estimated by HELP and true measured latencies on unseen devices (Table 2).
  • Meta-Training HELP model.

2.1. Data Preparation and Model Checkpoint

We include all required datasets and checkpoints in this github repository.

2.2. [Meta-Test] Architecture ranking correlation

You can compute architecture ranking correlation between latencies estimated by HELP and true measured latencies on unseen devices on FBNet search space (Table 2):

$ python main.py --search_space fbnet \
	--mode 'meta-test' \
	--num_samples 10 \
	--num_episodes 4000 \
	--num_meta_train_sample 4000 \
	--load_path './data/fbnet/checkpoint/help_max_corr.pt' \
	--meta_train_devices '1080ti_1,1080ti_32,1080ti_64,silver_4114,silver_4210r,samsung_a50,pixel3,essential_ph_1,samsung_s7' \
	--meta_valid_devices 'titanx_1,titanx_32,titanx_64,gold_6240' \
	--meta_test_devices 'fpga,raspi4,eyeriss'

or you can use provided script:

$ bash script/run_meta_test_fbnet.sh [GPU_NUM]

Architecture Ranking Correlation Results (Table 2)

Method Raspi4 ASIC FPGA Mean
MAML 0.718 0.763 0.727 0.736
Meta-SGD 0.821 0.822 0.776 0.806
HELP (Ours) 0.887 0.943 0.892 0.910

2.3. Meta-Training HELP model

Note that this process is performed only once for all results.

$ python main.py --search_space fbnet \
	--mode 'meta-train' \
	--num_samples 10 \
	--num_episodes 4000 \
	--num_meta_train_sample 4000 \
	--exp_name [EXP_NAME] \
	--meta_train_devices '1080ti_1,1080ti_32,1080ti_64,silver_4114,silver_4210r,samsung_a50,pixel3,essential_ph_1,samsung_s7' \
	--meta_valid_devices 'titanx_1,titanx_32,titanx_64,gold_6240' \
	--meta_test_devices 'fpga,raspi4,eyeriss' \
	--seed 3 # e.g.) 1, 2, 3

or you can use provided script:

$ bash script/run_meta_training_fbnet.sh [GPU_NUM]

The results (checkpoint file, log file etc) are saved in

./results/fbnet/[EXP_NAME]

3. Reproduce Main Results on OFA Search Space

We provide the code to reproduce the main results on OFA search space as follows:

  • Latency-constrained NAS Results with accuracy predictor of OFA + HELP on unseen devices (Table 5).
  • Validating obatined neural architecture on ImageNet-1K.
  • Meta-Training HELP model.

3.1. Data Preparation and Model Checkpoint

We include required datasets except ImageNet-1K, and checkpoints in this github repository. To validate obatined neural architecture on ImageNet-1K, you should download ImageNet-1K (2012 ver.)

3.2. [Meta-Test] Efficient Latency-constrained NAS combined with accuracy predictor of OFA

You can reproduce latency-constrained NAS results with OFA + HELP on unseen devices on OFA search space (Table 5):

python main.py \
	--search_space ofa \
	--mode nas \
	--num_samples 10 \
	--seed 3 \
	--num_meta_train_sample 4000 \
	--load_path './data/ofa/checkpoint/help_max_corr.pt' \
	--nas_target_device [DEVICE_NAME] \
	--latency_constraint [LATENCY_CONSTRAINT] \
	--exp_name 'nas' \
	--meta_train_devices '2080ti_1,2080ti_32,2080ti_64,titan_xp_1,titan_xp_32,titan_xp_64,v100_1,v100_32,v100_64' \
	--meta_valid_devices 'titan_rtx_1,titan_rtx_32' \
	--meta_test_devices 'titan_rtx_64' 

For example,

$ python main.py \
	--search_space ofa \
	--mode nas \
	--num_samples 10 \
	--seed 3 \
	--num_meta_train_sample 4000 \
	--load_path './data/ofa/checkpoint/help_max_corr.pt' \
	--nas_target_device titan_rtx_64 \
	--latency_constraint 20 \
	--exp_name 'nas' \
	--meta_train_devices '2080ti_1,2080ti_32,2080ti_64,titan_xp_1,titan_xp_32,titan_xp_64,v100_1,v100_32,v100_64' \
	--meta_valid_devices 'titan_rtx_1,titan_rtx_32' \
	--meta_test_devices 'titan_rtx_64' 

or you can use provided script:

$ bash script/run_nas_ofa.sh [GPU_NUM]

Efficient Latency-constrained NAS Results (Table 5)

Device Sample from
Target Device
Latency
Constraint (ms)
Latency
(ms)
Accuracy
(%)
Architecture
config
GPU Titan RTX
(Batch 64)
10 20
23
28
20.3
23.1
28.6
76.0
76.8
77.9
link
link
link
CPU Intel Gold 6226 20 170
190
147
171
77.6
78.1
link
link
Jetson AGX Xavier 10 65
70
67.4
76.4
75.9
76.4
link
link

3.3. Validating obtained neural architecture on ImageNet-1K

$ python validate_imagenet.py \
		--config_path [Path of neural architecture config file]
		--imagenet_save_path [Path of ImageNet 1k]

for example,

$ python validate_imagenet.py \
		--config_path 'data/ofa/architecture_config/gpu_titan_rtx_64/latency_28.6ms_accuracy_77.9.json' \
		--imagenet_save_path './ILSVRC2012'

3.4. Meta-training HELP model

Note that this process is performed only once for all results.

$ python main.py --search_space ofa \
		--mode 'meta-train' \
		--num_samples 10 \
		--num_meta_train_sample 4000 \
		--exp_name [EXP_NAME] \
                --meta_train_devices '2080ti_1,2080ti_32,2080ti_64,titan_xp_1,titan_xp_32,titan_xp_64,v100_1,v100_32,v100_64' \
                --meta_valid_devices 'titan_rtx_1,titan_rtx_32' \
                --meta_test_devices 'titan_rtx_64' \
		--seed 3 # e.g.) 1, 2, 3

or you can use provided script:

$ bash script/run_meta_training_ofa.sh [GPU_NUM]

4. Main Results on HAT Search Space

We provide the neural architecture configurations to reproduce the results of machine translation (WMT'14 En-De Task) on HAT search space.

Efficient Latency-constrained NAS Results

Task Device Samples from
Target Device
Latency BLEU score Architecture
Config
WMT'14 En-De GPU NVIDIA Titan RTX 10 74.0ms
106.5ms
27.19
27.44
link
link
WMT'14 En-De CPU Intel Xeon Gold 6240 10 159.6ms
343.2ms
27.20
27.52
link
link

You can test models by BLEU score and Computing Latency.

Reference

Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networks (ICML17)

Meta-SGD: Learning to Learn Quickly for Few-Shot Learning

Once-for-All: Train One Network and Specialize it for Efficient Deployment (ICLR20)

NAS-Bench-201: Extending the Scope of Reproducible Neural Architecture Search (ICLR20)

BRP-NAS: Prediction-based NAS using GCNs (NeurIPS20)

HAT: Hardware Aware Transformers for Efficient Natural Language Processing (ACL20)

Rapid Neural Architecture Search by Learning to Generate Graphs from Datasets (ICLR21)

HW-NAS-Bench: Hardware-Aware Neural Architecture Search Benchmark (ICLR21)

Owner
Ph.D. student @ School of Computing, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)
Single-step adversarial training (AT) has received wide attention as it proved to be both efficient and robust.

Subspace Adversarial Training Single-step adversarial training (AT) has received wide attention as it proved to be both efficient and robust. However,

15 Sep 02, 2022
A PyTorch-Based Framework for Deep Learning in Computer Vision

TorchCV: A PyTorch-Based Framework for Deep Learning in Computer Vision @misc{you2019torchcv, author = {Ansheng You and Xiangtai Li and Zhen Zhu a

Donny You 2.2k Jan 09, 2023
Pipeline for employing a Lightweight deep learning models for LOW-power systems

PL-LOW A high-performance deep learning model lightweight pipeline that gradually lightens deep neural networks in order to utilize high-performance d

POSTECH Data Intelligence Lab 9 Aug 13, 2022
The PyTorch implementation of Directed Graph Contrastive Learning (DiGCL), NeurIPS-2021

Directed Graph Contrastive Learning The PyTorch implementation of Directed Graph Contrastive Learning (DiGCL). In this paper, we present the first con

Tong Zekun 28 Jan 08, 2023
Diffgram - Supervised Learning Data Platform

Data Annotation, Data Labeling, Annotation Tooling, Training Data for Machine Learning

Diffgram 1.6k Jan 07, 2023
[CVPR 2020] 3D Photography using Context-aware Layered Depth Inpainting

[CVPR 2020] 3D Photography using Context-aware Layered Depth Inpainting [Paper] [Project Website] [Google Colab] We propose a method for converting a

Virginia Tech Vision and Learning Lab 6.2k Jan 01, 2023
Implementation of Hourglass Transformer, in Pytorch, from Google and OpenAI

Hourglass Transformer - Pytorch (wip) Implementation of Hourglass Transformer, in Pytorch. It will also contain some of my own ideas about how to make

Phil Wang 61 Dec 25, 2022
Official PyTorch implementation of PICCOLO: Point-Cloud Centric Omnidirectional Localization (ICCV 2021)

Official PyTorch implementation of PICCOLO: Point-Cloud Centric Omnidirectional Localization (ICCV 2021)

16 Nov 19, 2022
automated systems to assist guarding corona Virus precautions for Closed Rooms (e.g. Halls, offices, etc..)

Automatic-precautionary-guard automated systems to assist guarding corona Virus precautions for Closed Rooms (e.g. Halls, offices, etc..) what is this

badra 0 Jan 06, 2022
Official pytorch implementation of Active Learning for deep object detection via probabilistic modeling (ICCV 2021)

Active Learning for Deep Object Detection via Probabilistic Modeling This repository is the official PyTorch implementation of Active Learning for Dee

NVIDIA Research Projects 130 Jan 06, 2023
Hepsiburada - Hepsiburada Urun Bilgisi Cekme

Hepsiburada Urun Bilgisi Cekme from hepsiburada import Marka nike = Marka("nike"

Ilker Manap 8 Oct 26, 2022
Code for the paper "A Study of Face Obfuscation in ImageNet"

A Study of Face Obfuscation in ImageNet Code for the paper: A Study of Face Obfuscation in ImageNet Kaiyu Yang, Jacqueline Yau, Li Fei-Fei, Jia Deng,

35 Oct 04, 2022
Facial Action Unit Intensity Estimation via Semantic Correspondence Learning with Dynamic Graph Convolution

FAU Implementation of the paper: Facial Action Unit Intensity Estimation via Semantic Correspondence Learning with Dynamic Graph Convolution. Yingruo

Evelyn 78 Nov 29, 2022
Customised to detect objects automatically by a given model file(onnx)

LabelImg LabelImg is a graphical image annotation tool. It is written in Python and uses Qt for its graphical interface. Annotations are saved as XML

Heeone Lee 1 Jun 07, 2022
Dewarping Document Image By Displacement Flow Estimation with Fully Convolutional Network.

Dewarping Document Image By Displacement Flow Estimation with Fully Convolutional Network

111 Dec 27, 2022
This is an official implementation for "SimMIM: A Simple Framework for Masked Image Modeling".

Project This repo has been populated by an initial template to help get you started. Please make sure to update the content to build a great experienc

Microsoft 674 Dec 26, 2022
[CVPR 2022 Oral] Crafting Better Contrastive Views for Siamese Representation Learning

Crafting Better Contrastive Views for Siamese Representation Learning (CVPR 2022 Oral) 2022-03-29: The paper was selected as a CVPR 2022 Oral paper! 2

249 Dec 28, 2022
ISNAS-DIP: Image Specific Neural Architecture Search for Deep Image Prior [CVPR 2022]

ISNAS-DIP: Image-Specific Neural Architecture Search for Deep Image Prior (CVPR 2022) Metin Ersin Arican*, Ozgur Kara*, Gustav Bredell, Ender Konukogl

Özgür Kara 24 Dec 18, 2022
Symbolic Parallel Adaptive Importance Sampling for Probabilistic Program Analysis in JAX

SYMPAIS: Symbolic Parallel Adaptive Importance Sampling for Probabilistic Program Analysis Overview | Installation | Documentation | Examples | Notebo

Yicheng Luo 4 Sep 13, 2022
The source code of CVPR17 'Generative Face Completion'.

GenerativeFaceCompletion Matcaffe implementation of our CVPR17 paper on face completion. In each panel from left to right: original face, masked input

Yijun Li 313 Oct 18, 2022